日SAT写作真题及解析-坦途教育网免费课程咨询：400-801-6269（8:30-21:30）SAT考试网日SAT写作真题及解析 13:57:26来源：SAT考试网导读：5月5日的考试已经过去了，同学们都答的怎么样呢。今天小编整理了SAT真题回忆来分享给大家，希望能对大家有所帮助，此次分享的是写作篇的内容分析，快随小编一起来回忆一下当天的考题内容吧。
：日SAT写作真题及解析
次的SAT写作的文章，没有一个数字，没有引用，没有专家，没有权 威机构，reasoning部分也没有信号词，让很多还有模板依赖的同学大呼不适应。很明显，18年以来，
CB选用的文章已经放弃了原来“浅显易懂”的分析要素--引用权 威、数据以及明显的对比，过去三次考试，CB选择的文章更看重reasoning，所以多见的是cause-effect，root
cause， clarify misconception等，这种趋势值得大家重视。请看针对5月5日SAT写作的分析解读及高分范文。
5月5日SAT写作分析
此次SAT写作的文章Give the Data to the People选自2014年地New York
Times，文章浅显易懂，歌颂地是当下的“分享经济”，鼓励更多的pharmaceutical
companies分享临床试验数据，互通有无，分享相关地试验数据，提高研发新药的速度，减少药物的副作用，为社会做出更多的贡献。
这篇文章的evidence部分主要运用的是medical evidence 和典型案例分析(case study)，并且用业内的leader做role
model，增强Reasoning的部分来说，主要的是contrast和cause-effect
analysis，此外还有pre-em emotional appeals主要集中在文章的最后，用sense of
duty/responsibility/ Samaritan spirit(好人精神)来uplift social morale.
纵观全文，虽然没有同学们最钟爱的Statistics 证据，但是具有很多关键的factual evidence 。这其中采用了concession
rebuttal的论证关系来阐明公开早就数据的可行性。对于目前的现状，通过irony来表明数据公开的紧迫性和必要性。而在文章末尾，又通过parallelism来列举该项计划的好处。可以组织的点比较多，但是一定要注意作者自身的参与是本文的一大亮点，也就是通过自身付出的努力来获得读者进一步的信任，以专家的姿态展现对于困难与好处的理解，并以科学的严谨态度和责任感来获得共鸣。
5月5日SAT写作范文
Give the Data to the People
In his opinion piece "Give the Data to the People" the author Harlan
Krumholz emphasizes the importance of Open Data Access Project (YODA), dispels
potential concerns thereof and urges more pharmaceutical companies to open
clinical trial data to the world for public good. By citing recent news, role
models, addressing root causes and using emotive language the author manages to
makes his argument persuasive.
To begin with, the author cites a recent development of the YODA Project
that Johnson & Johnson, a world's leading pharmaceutical company announces
to participate. The Project is designed to make all of its "clinical trial data
available to scientists around the world". "This is as an extraordinary donation
to society" comments the author who, in this powerful way, begins his article
and successfully grabs readers' attention to the topic under discussion, that
is, the sharing of clinical trial data.
To follow, author informs the readers a rather disheartening fact that
today "more than half of the clinical trials in the US" are not published. This
is a stark contrast to the Samaritan decision of Johnson & Johnson. Worse,
even when studies are published, the actual data are usually not made available
to the public. The author argues that such practice has "troubling implications"
for instance, full information on a drug's effects may "never be discovered or
released" and end-users of research are "forced to accept the report" without
independent re-evaluations. These two implications are indeed fearful reasons to
change the status quo of the current practice. As it is known to all, drugs may
have ill-effects, so the fact that drug's ill-effects are not disclosed to the
public is rather disturbing, thus paving way for more popular support for the
Project. Also, the author assumes a rather solemn tone, criticizing the practice
as a "violation of a central tenet of the scientific method”, a very serious
accusation indeed.
Next, the author addresses the root cause of why pharmaceuticals refuse to
open data: their worries about competition as well as potential legal
complications if mistakenly used by incompetent scientists. To readers, although
the author acknowledges legitimacy to some extent, both reasons could be
dismissed as ego-centric or little regard for public good. To dispel these
concerns, the author quotes two more industrial leaders such as GSK and
Medtronic, both support the Project, as role models and argues that, with more
pharmaceuticals sharing such data, "the more we find that many of these problems
fail to materialize". To buttress his claim, he quotes YODA's partnering with
Medtronic in 2011 with a view to exemplifying how the Project works and its
importance to the society. In this case, he cites a medical cancer-treatment
device that the Medtronic produces. Unsurprisingly, conflicting results were
revealed after two independent reviews, based on the data that the companies
made available globally, were commissioned. It is noteworthy that the author's
choice of a life-threatening disease perfectly echoes what the author fears as
troubling implications if pharmaceuticals refuse to do so. Furthermore, the
author dispels potential concerns from pharmaceuticals, the misuse, or even
worse, the abuse of such data by emphasizing YODA's role in the
Project--gatekeeping. The author repeatedly uses "we" to emphasize his team's
role during the whole process. As one of the world's most prestigious
university, Yale's rep therefore readers would be relieved
about their unnecessary worry. At this point, the author's apt employment of
contrast, logical reasoning, exemplification and Yale University's reputation
and authority as referral would suffice to convince readers of the YODA
Toward the end, the author wraps up the importance of the Project by
eulogizing the benefits of data sharing. He uses a set of parallel sentences,
long sentences Interwoven with shorter ones to create a sense of urgency,
appealing to pharmaceutical companies' duty for public good. Phrases such as an
organization play a role as a "good global citizen", scientists to "use the data
to learn new ways to help patients" are used to uplift individual companies for
public good.(667词)
以上就是今天分享的SAT写作篇的真题回忆内容了，想要了解更多内容可以来，小编就提前在这里祝福大家都能得到满意的成绩去到理想的大学啦！
温馨提示：因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整，坦途网提供的以上信息仅供参考，如有异议，请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准！06-1105-2305-2305-23SAT培训课程免费试听课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验无锡无锡无锡无锡无锡无锡无锡无锡更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验北京北京北京北京北京北京北京北京更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验上海上海上海上海上海上海上海上海更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验天津天津天津天津天津天津天津天津更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验广州广州广州广州广州广州广州广州更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验深圳深圳深圳深圳深圳深圳深圳深圳更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验重庆重庆重庆重庆重庆重庆重庆重庆更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验西安西安西安西安西安西安西安西安更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验成都成都成都成都成都成都成都成都更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验济南济南济南济南济南济南济南济南更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验南京南京南京南京南京南京南京南京更多预约免费体验课您的信息不会显示在页面上或泄露给他人，我们将会通过***反馈给您*您的需求最新文章***英语培训高端品牌！无锡雅思培训品牌机构！您身边的出国留学培训专家。 无锡雅思培训高端品牌！世界各国名校直达申请英语成功之道！满足学生个性化需求！
更多新东方打造3-18岁高端青少儿英语培训机构来朗阁，实现雅思托福蜕变计划！雅思培训专家，学员们的首选！中国强大的出国留学语言培训机构英语成功之道！专业的少儿英语培训机构！学习平台国际化英语口语培训专家！中国专业的留学语言培训机构
更多英语改变从现在开始沪上规模较大的非学历教育培训机构！做雅思、托福的佼佼者！上海最顶尖的出国留学培训机构！出国语言培训优秀品牌!为中国学生创建英语成功之道！提供欧美高端留学一站式服务！出国语言考试个性化教学标准缔造者
更多免费课程咨询：400-801-6269&&&&&&&&真道（北京）信息技术有限公司版权所有　京ICP备号-1
教育顾问咨询***400-801-6269针对SAT考试官方发布考试相关新政策-坦途教育网免费课程咨询：400-801-6269（8:30-21:30）SAT考试网针对SAT考试官方发布考试相关新政策 09:29:42来源：SAT考试网导读：去年一月份，官方发布了SAT考试场次的变动政策，引得不少考生及家长非常焦虑担心会影响考试的发挥水平。小编就与官方项目主任的沟通，在想大家普及一下有关新政策的调整依据，详情请见正文。
：针对SAT考试官方发布考试相关新政策
1、美国以外的国际考点，以后每年4次SAT考试，5次SAT subjects考试，只要提前计划好，学生应该不会有损失的。
2、考试的成绩不是由参加的频率决定的，几个月的时间频繁去考不会有本质上的飞跃，大学需要学生具有的学习能力需要日积月累的沉淀，只要好好学习准备到位，不需要考那么多次，一两次就能考出好成绩。
3、SAT考试所有题型和重点知识点都在官网上全公开，6套免费模拟考题可以试考，不需要去裸考摸底。Khan Academy提供全免费个性化的考前准备练习，针对每个学生的弱点重点突击，高效提高satpractice.org
4、报名问题请去官网查询：https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/sat/register
5、考位问题各考点不同，恕不能具体答复。
正式印证了之前小编的观点，CB官方做这样的调整肯定是有依据的，5月、10月、12月考试足够满足学生需求，所以大多数考生没有必要恐慌。
其实CB很少因为报考的问题接受媒体采访的，这次估计也是被考生问的实在太多了，通过这种方式对外传递一下CB的立场。
对于能否参加6月美国SAT考场，既不否认，也不肯定，其中原因，小编在Collegeboard是否禁止国际学生参加6月北美考试跟大多数SAT考生都没关系中已经阐述过，所以考生不要再押注6月，甚至是8月了，调整好自己的备考计划，安心备考
以上就是有关SAT考试内容的变动介绍，小编相信新政策的实施一定有其重要意义，官方做出的决定也是站在考生和大环境之间做出权衡的。在普及后大家是不是对SAT考试也有了更加深入的了解了？提醒大家不要产生不必要的恐慌情绪，对考试发挥也是有影响的。有一个良好的心态也是提升成绩的因素之一。
温馨提示：因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整，坦途网提供的以上信息仅供参考，如有异议，请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准！07-2607-1704-0403-26SAT培训课程免费试听课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验无锡无锡无锡无锡无锡无锡无锡无锡更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验北京北京北京北京北京北京北京北京更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验上海上海上海上海上海上海上海上海更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验天津天津天津天津天津天津天津天津更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验广州广州广州广州广州广州广州广州更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验深圳深圳深圳深圳深圳深圳深圳深圳更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验重庆重庆重庆重庆重庆重庆重庆重庆更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验西安西安西安西安西安西安西安西安更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验成都成都成都成都成都成都成都成都更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验济南济南济南济南济南济南济南济南更多课程名称机构名称教学点免费体验南京南京南京南京南京南京南京南京更多预约免费体验课您的信息不会显示在页面上或泄露给他人，我们将会通过***反馈给您*您的需求最新文章***英语培训高端品牌！无锡雅思培训品牌机构！您身边的出国留学培训专家。 无锡雅思培训高端品牌！世界各国名校直达申请英语成功之道！满足学生个性化需求！
更多新东方打造3-18岁高端青少儿英语培训机构来朗阁，实现雅思托福蜕变计划！雅思培训专家，学员们的首选！中国强大的出国留学语言培训机构英语成功之道！专业的少儿英语培训机构！学习平台国际化英语口语培训专家！中国专业的留学语言培训机构
更多英语改变从现在开始沪上规模较大的非学历教育培训机构！做雅思、托福的佼佼者！上海最顶尖的出国留学培训机构！出国语言培训优秀品牌!为中国学生创建英语成功之道！提供欧美高端留学一站式服务！出国语言考试个性化教学标准缔造者
更多免费课程咨询：400-801-6269&&&&&&&&真道（北京）信息技术有限公司版权所有　京ICP备号-1
教育顾问咨询***400-801-6269