当前位置：
&被RSC advances拒稿要求重投了，求助大家帮忙看看邮件，我还有没有机会再被接收！！！
被RSC advances拒稿要求重投了，求助大家帮忙看看邮件，我还有没有机会再被接收！！！
作者 薇啊薇vivi
投了一个月，送审以后，一个大修，一个拒稿，编辑给了拒稿重投。但是第二个审稿人说话好tough啊。。。大神们求助，这种情况，还要不要再重投试试看啊。。。。
RSC Advances, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.
After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reviewers’ comments, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication and therefore it has been rejected in its current form.
However, if you are able to fully address the concerns raised by the reviewers in the reports below, I will consider a substantially rewritten manuscript which takes into account all of the reviewers’ comments. If you choose to resubmit your manuscript, please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made.
REVIEWER REPORT(S):
Referee: 1
Recommendation: Major revisions
In this work, the authors have prepared micro-patterns on PDMS and studied the effect of bacterial cell adhesion. With the growing interest in preparing surfaces with patterns/ topography to prepare anti-bacterial surfaces this is an important area of work. The results are interesting but there are a number of concerns that must be addressed before this work may be considered for publication-
1. A number of studies have been reported in this area of work in recent years, so the novelty of these features/ uniqueness of this work is unclear
2. The motivation for the choice of these features and their size ranges is not explained in the Introduction. It is partly discussed in the Discussion where how the feature sizes scale with bacterial sizes is discussed to explain the rationale. The Introduction section should be modified to incorporate the motivation more clearly.
3. Similar to comment 1 above, the discussion section should include how these results support or contradict the literature since many such studies have been reported.
4. Minor comment- In Fug 2, the y-axis may be expanded in the 0 to 15% range with a break to accommodate the control if needed to clearly present the results of the patterned surfaces which are barely visible now.
5. The authors are advised to take help from a native speaker to correct the grammatical errors in the text.
Referee: 2
Recommendation: Reject
In this article author fabricated 3 different micro-patterned polydimethylsiloxane films with various pattern sizes from 0.5 μm to 4μm to study the effect of micro-patterned on the bacterial adhesion. Several similar studies already reported in the literatures.
From this study authors have drawn very general conclusion that the micro-pattern topography could reduce the attachment of these 3 strains. The difference between the pattern size and the bacteria size was crucial to the amount of bacteria adhered on the surfaces for different strains. This general knowledge already reported in several literatures. The present study and result is just a repeated experiment of what already published by several authors. This study does not provide any additional scientific knowledge what already known in the scientific community.
Authors used three different micro-patterned namely square, ridges and four-way grids. Authors did not explain the basis and rational of this particular design of this study. Authors should think critically on novelty and expected outcome of their work before designing and performing this experiment. Author should judge the scientific merit of their paper before sending for publication to any journal.
不用理会第二个人的意见，明显是个愤青
引用回帖:: Originally posted by sunsuper110 at
不用理会第二个人的意见，明显是个愤青 好开心你回复我了！！！！感谢！！！
所以，你是不是建议我，就按第一个人的意见改好重投？
我觉的对于第二个人，回复一下你文章的亮点
其实两个审稿人的观点是相仿的，就是你的文章没有把亮点写清楚甚至说没有亮点，第二个人的语气只是太直接而已。
你自己先衡量一下自己的工作，创新点究竟是哪些，再去看看是否可以说服审稿人。否则，还是改投吧。
感觉还是创新点的问题吧。创新点阐述不明确，或者缺乏创新点！
引用回帖:: Originally posted by 铁血军魂 at
感觉还是创新点的问题吧。创新点阐述不明确，或者缺乏创新点！ 嗯呢，因为第一次写文章，introduction写的很笼统，没有讲自己的工作跟别人有什么差别。您觉得这种问题改好了还有机会吗？
我自己感觉创新还是有的，但是确实不多，希望改好还有机会中吧，谢谢！
引用回帖:: Originally posted by grayong at
其实两个审稿人的观点是相仿的，就是你的文章没有把亮点写清楚甚至说没有亮点，第二个人的语气只是太直接而已。
你自己先衡量一下自己的工作，创新点究竟是哪些，再去看看是否可以说服审稿人。否则，还是改投吧。 嗯呢，因为第一次写文章，introduction写的很笼统，没有讲自己的工作跟别人有什么差别。您觉得这种问题改好了还有机会吗？小老师说要继续改。。。哎。。。
我自己感觉创新还是有的，但是确实不多，希望改好还有机会中吧，谢谢，
24小时热帖
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流平板/笔记本
HiLink生态产品
终端云服务专区
请大家帮忙看看是不是我设置的不对还是机器问题
&炉火纯青&
来自：浏览器
1月20号晚上我下单买的荣耀路由Pro，1月23日我收到货。随之我办理了移动宽带
下面是我的设置过程。。。。。
我第一次设置的是wifi中继
这个wifi密码我是特意流出来的因为后面有情况
注意两次密码都是一样的
这样后跳到这个界面
我就想着刚刚上面设置的密码于是就试试结果如下
我没办法了。
求大神帮忙看看，我现在去设置用宽带连接的了。
路由器重置中......
width:100%">
&炉火纯青&
来自：浏览器
我的图为什么一张都不见了
width:100%">
&炉火纯青&
来自：浏览器
在审核吗？？？？？？？？？/
width:100%">
&渐入佳境&
来自：浏览器
原来是这样的啊
width:100%">
&炉火纯青&
来自：浏览器
image.png (280.38 KB, 下载次数: 4)
01:13 上传
width:100%">
&炉火纯青&
来自：浏览器
image.png (402.64 KB, 下载次数: 1)
01:15 上传
width:100%">
&炉火纯青&
来自：浏览器
真是的我遇到问题发帖求助，事实求是。是机器问题还是我设置的问题让大家来讨论凭什么删我的帖子，明天我继续发，大不了你封我
width:100%">
&独步江湖&
来自：浏览器
lz，没有照片出来，还是文字描述的具体点吧
width:100%">
&独步江湖&
来自：浏览器
您好，能把您的问题具体描述一下吗？图片没有显示出来。
width:100%">
&炉火纯青&
来自：浏览器
路由小帮手 发表于
您好，能把您的问题具体描述一下吗？图片没有显示出来。
我现在搞好了，无轮是手机还是电脑的网页上设置路由都不行，用手机APP设置就行了，
width:100%">
关注华为花粉俱乐部微信公众平台----“华为花粉俱乐部”
深圳西涌上帝视角的星城戈壁里的莫高窟港澳游--风车，海边
花粉客户端
Make it Possible
Make your device special
华为云空间
Huawei cloud services
音乐播放器
Huawei Music
Huawei Vmall
关注花粉俱乐部
举报邮箱：
|关注花粉俱乐部：
增值电信业务经营许可证：苏B2-号|
Copyright (C)
华为软件技术有限公司 版权所有 保留一切权利